Delivered-To: john.podesta@gmail.com
Received: by 10.142.49.14 with SMTP id w14cs451392wfw;
Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:16:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.90.27.10 with SMTP id a10mr6816241aga.31.1226373382573;
Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:16:22 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <Todd.Stern@wilmerhale.com>
Received: from mail166.messagelabs.com (mail166.messagelabs.com [216.82.253.163])
by mx.google.com with SMTP id 9si9413747agc.31.2008.11.10.19.16.19;
Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:16:21 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of Todd.Stern@wilmerhale.com designates 216.82.253.163 as permitted sender) client-ip=216.82.253.163;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of Todd.Stern@wilmerhale.com designates 216.82.253.163 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=Todd.Stern@wilmerhale.com
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: Todd.Stern@wilmerhale.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-6.tower-166.messagelabs.com!1226373377!20740830!2
X-StarScan-Version: 5.5.12.14.2; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [148.139.13.5]
Received: (qmail 28756 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2008 03:16:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO SVBOSAPPDMZ1.wilmerhale.com) (148.139.13.5)
by server-6.tower-166.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 11 Nov 2008 03:16:18 -0000
Received: from SDCPEXCCL2MX.wilmerhale.com ([148.139.192.1]) by SVBOSAPPDMZ1.wilmerhale.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
Mon, 10 Nov 2008 22:16:16 -0500
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Subject: RE: GTMO, Torture, renditions, etc.
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 22:16:16 -0500
Message-ID: <3D4E0DAB0236644193F6AA291205B23B04542188@SDCPEXCCL2MX.wilmerhale.com>
In-Reply-To: <ab48a30f0811101914o1849d11axddf87e645f95f66d@mail.gmail.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: GTMO, Torture, renditions, etc.
Thread-Index: AclDq8FfMZpzA9geR3SQIDGMG1ISiAAABChA
From: "Stern, Todd" <Todd.Stern@wilmerhale.com>
To: "Christopher Edley" <cedley@gmail.com>, ricesusane@aol.com,
"John Podesta" <john.podesta@gmail.com>,
"Lisa Brown" <lisabrown3660@gmail.com>, "Don Gips" <don.gips@level3.com>,
"Melody Barnes" <mbarnes@barackobama.com>,
"Cassandra Butts" <cbutts.obama08@gmail.com>
Return-Path: Todd.Stern@wilmerhale.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Nov 2008 03:16:16.0331 (UTC) FILETIME=[DBD381B0:01C943AB]
Hang on -- crossing emails. Pls see mine.=20
-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Edley [mailto:cedley@gmail.com]=20
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 10:15 PM
To: ricesusane@aol.com; John Podesta; Stern, Todd; Lisa Brown; Don Gips;
Melody Barnes; Cassandra Butts
Subject: Re: GTMO, Torture, renditions, etc.
Thanks susan -- as to whether we should do more, I don't know. Why
don't I put on my board hat, with permission of melody and don, and
poke around a bit as to who from the doj team isinvolved, and their
direction -- and then report back to everyone if I sense any
difficulty? Let's assume everything is okay until there is contrary
evidence. Thanks
On 11/10/08, ricesusane@aol.com <ricesusane@aol.com> wrote:
> Thanks, Chris.
>
> Mary De Rosa is doing these issues from nat sec side and is already
plugged
> into DOJ team as I understand it.
>
> Is there more we should do, in your view, to ensure appropriate
lash-up?
> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Christopher Edley" <cedley@gmail.com>
>
> Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 14:52:07
> To: John Podesta<john.podesta@gmail.com>; Susan
Rice<ricesusane@aol.com>;
> Stern, Todd<todd.stern@wilmerhale.com>; Lisa
Brown<lisabrown3660@gmail.com>;
> Don Gips<don.gips@level3.com>; Melody Barnes<mbarnes@barackobama.com>;
> Cassandra Butts<cbutts.obama08@gmail.com>
> Subject: GTMO, Torture, renditions, etc.
>
>
> Todd et al.,
>
> I'm writing to ask where we stand with respect to working through the
> national securities law and civil liberties law concerning the topics
> above. I believe we agreed that some cross-talk between the National
> Security team and the DOJ/Domestic team is required, but I don't
recall
> getting to closure on which individuals have the lead.
>
> The exchange I had with Susan Rice at the last Board meeting is
> illustrative
> of the difficulty. There can be an inherent tension between the
national
> security perspective and the Rule of Law perspective. As we know, this
> played out in the Bush Administration rather tragically, and the vast
> majority of legal observers believe that the DOJ participants acted in
a
> manner that -- at a minimum -- violated fundamental ethical and
> professional
> principles, if not the Law. As a formal matter, whatever course of
policy
> and action the Obama Administration adopts on these issues, clearance
by
> OLC
> and the Attorney General will be required, as well as review by White
House
> Counsel.
>
> So, I believe the Transition should likewise get the right set of
> perspectives around a table sooner rather than later.
>
> There is another, related issue that deserves some attention: The role
of
> OLC in relation to the State Department Legal Adviser (L). The Bush
> Administration broke with precedent by shifting more authority to OLC
for
> definitive resolution of questions of international law and treaty
> interpretation. L was consulted, but the formal lead rested with OLC.
> Earlier administrations allowed the State Department to have the lead.
> What
> will be the practice in the Obama Administration? There are arguments
in
> both directions. It would be good to get this resolved before the
> appointees
> are selected.
>
> I am interested in these issues, having taught National Security Law.
But I
> know there are several terrific lawyers who could contribute a lot:
Eric
> Holder, Jamie Gorelick, Larry Tribe, Cass Sunstein, Alex Aleinikoff.
>
>
> --
> (personal email)
> Christopher Edley, Jr.
> Professor and Dean
> UC Berkeley Law School
>
>
--=20
Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com
(personal email)
Christopher Edley, Jr.
Professor and Dean
UC Berkeley Law School
